attractive.space is part of the decentralized social network powered by Mastodon.
For creative individuals and companies who love beautiful art, emotive writing, wonderful products, inspiring technology and enticing design. For those who build whole new worlds.

Administered by:

Server stats:

8
active users

Learn more

#rupaul

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

I conflicted with Plane Jane, on one hand she is catty AF and we stan them mean queens but on the other hand she just a dollar store Jimbo and I'm not sure her outfits and opinions will sustain her (like girl, Jimbo was giving wacky and sensational but the only memorable moments you have are in confessionals)

I want to love her, but I'm bananas over her nemesis lil mrs.Nymphia

#Introduction Post, I am a #gay #computer #nerd
that resides in #Seattle. I enjoy #RuPaul and the friends that I meet every week to view the new episode.

#Moby is my all time favorite artist.

I am also the #SystemOperator of this of this #Mastodon instance, aiming to build a friendly community that supports each other while making everyone smile at the same time!

I also like #Bread, do you like bread? 🌈

I operate a Joke Line as well. Call: +1-800-961-7345

USpol, News Media, Drag Shows, Trans people

I'm old enough to remember how the US news media used to ALWAYS go to an anti-gay hate group for a statement EVERY SINGLE TIME there was ANY news story featuring a member of the LGBT+ community, for some moronic copypasta statement about how awful we are, like they were obligated to get an "opposing view" about whether LGBT+ people were allowed to exist and to have experiences that other people could hear about.

And yet, when mouth-breathing morons like DeSantis and his constipated cohorts rant and rave about drag queens or trans people, have we EVER seen the inverse behavior? For example, a news outlet asking RuPaul Charles what he thinks of imbecile politicians attacking harmless drag performers? Or asking prominent members of the trans community what they think of DeSantis?

No?

Why is that?

Surely readers are entitled to an "opposing view."